Both a virtuoso display of Mann-esque muscular filmmaking as
well as a sobering humanist tract, “Gravity” plumbs the depths of the human
soul.
The story concerns Dr. Ryan Stone (portrayed by a
Madonna-like Sandra Bullock), who, as a Mission Specialist, is on her first
mission in the depths of space – working on the space shuttle Explorer. She is
joined by George Clooney’s Kowalski – a smooth ladies man veteran astronaut
who, whilst thrusting around on a propulsion-fueled jetpack, is having a ball
on his final expedition. Stone, obviously a little shaky due to her relative
inexperience, and Kowalski – in the process of working on the electronics
modules outside the Explorer – receive a distress message from Houston (voiced
Ed Harris, space picture veteran) that the Russian demolition of a satellite
has caused a vast field of debris to barrel towards them, a veritable field of
space shrapnel.
We watch rapturously as the formerly serene, still beauty of
space is perverted into a cacophony of shredding metal and terrified, muffled
gasps as the Explorer is decimated. Stone, now acting as a centrifuge due to
her connection to a mechanical arm that links her to the ship, detaches
herself, and out drifting into the void she goes, hyperventilating, panicked.
Lost among the vast expanse of stars, she must make her way to a nearby
international space station if life is to remain in her grasp.
All this information is communicated in one solitary
long-take, which is thirteen minutes long
– without a cut. Using CGI technology to its fullest extent, Cuarón (at the top
of his powers, working with the inimitable Emmanuel Lubezki) glides his camera
through the scene, setting up the relations of the characters as well as their
relationship with the environment around them through masterfully precise
mise-en-scene. Though many articles (here)
it has been posited that “Gravity” could be classified as an animated film
(Bullock’s and Clooney’s visages remain the only facets not manipulated by CGI),
but the abundance of ones and zeroes that dot each frame are so immaculately
sculpted that that the artifice drifts away.
The canvas Cuarón paints this tale upon is literally cosmic
in scale, and in accordance with said scale, the images that he produces are
massive in their dense cultural cachet. Mainly Cuarón utilizes archetypal
imagery (primarily images that pertain to birth), putting loaded iconography
onscreen in a manner that does not seek to posit banal symbolism, but rather to
render the torment (and later, triumph) of the soul through elemental
semiotics.
Upon reentry, when Stone assumes the fetal position, while
it does work on a basic, rudimentary level (as a visual metaphor for the
character’s rebirth), the imagery is
also, more importantly, a cruel cosmic reminder of her deceased child. Stone is
shown, in this gesture, to be flogging herself – image as expression of
interior agony. It is here in which we must succumb to the wavelength Cuarón is
operating on.
Cuarón, rather than simply providing an elegant survival
story, gives an allegory that tackles the process of grieving. It is an
existential tract in which humanity (in the form of Stone) examines its
relationship with death. Everywhere Stone turns, an element of her surroundings
is a reminder of her child (relating to her daughter’s manner of death, Stone
also violently hits her head while attempting to extinguish a blaze; the
centrifuge-like mechanical arm Stone is attached to resembles a crib mobile).
Space is purgatory – where each element externalizes inner trauma. When looked at through this lens, the film
begins to resemble another film examining humanity’s struggle with grief and death: Tarkovsky's “Solaris”. Both are
achingly spiritual paeans dealing with the powerlessness of mankind in the face
of mortality.
Cuarón thus makes the subjective interior concrete exterior
through the bombastic imagery on display. This story of loss could ostensibly
take place in any locale, but the environment affords the tale extra
metaphorical heft, as space becomes a character unto itself, standing in for
the death (oppressive, omnipotent) that surrounds her and weighs on her
soul.
(Continued in Part
2)
This review as a whole is fantastic. Your writing is lively and your passion for and knowledge of cinema really come through. I loved the film too, and I hadn't even noticed all of the connections to her daughter's death. Your insight has given me another layer of the film to explore.
ReplyDelete